Hearing addresses transit strike proposal

Posted 2/19/09

Whether or not union employees can legally strike against the Regional Transportation District rests with a panel of Colorado Department of Labor and …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Username
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you made a voluntary contribution in 2022-2023 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

Hearing addresses transit strike proposal

Posted

Whether or not union employees can legally strike against the Regional Transportation District rests with a panel of Colorado Department of Labor and Employment officials.

The Amalgamated Transit Union 1001 wants a ruling forbidding the strike because of its impact on public health and safety. If the panel denies the union the right to strike then, if negotiations stall, the issue will be decided in binding arbitration.

However, RTD maintains the strike should be allowed because while it would cause inconveniences, it would not have significant impact on public health and safety. They also maintain that mandating arbitration removed the incentive to take part in meaningful contract negotiations and would turn the decision over to a third party, who may or may not be from the area or even from the state.

The sides are in negotiations, seeking to reach agreement on the contract for about 1,900 bus drivers, light rail operators and mechanics that expires Feb. 28. Reportedly, the sides are seeking to reach agreement in several areas, including the fact the union is asking for what was called, “a modest raise” while RTD battles a multimillion dollar budget deficit and seeks a wage freeze.

At a Feb. 19 hearing, both sides called witnesses and about a dozen people testified on the issue. About 80 people crowded the hearing room for the meeting. About a third of them were from the disabled community, on hand to tell the panel that a strike would have a major impact on their lives.

Bill Petropalos, one of the labor department officials presiding at the hearing, said there is no timetable for a decision but everyone recognized the seriousness of the issue.

He said the department has no guidelines for the procedure because this is the first time the right-to-strike issue presentations have been done orally. He said, in the past, the sides have presented their positions in written briefs.

“This is new for us,” Petropalos said. “But we know how important this is and our goal is to evaluate the information and hand down a decision as quickly as possible.”

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.