By reckoning of some, the balance between the rights of pets and those of human residents shifted June 7 when the Centennial City Council passed a …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
If you made a voluntary contribution in 2022-2023 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.
By reckoning of some, the balance between the rights of pets and
those of human residents shifted June 7 when the Centennial City
Council passed a new ordinance regulating loud dog barking.
“I don’t have the privilege that the dog has,” Joe Capicotto
said before the council’s unanimous vote. “The dog has the
privilege to bark for almost 20 minutes anytime day or night, take
a break and start over. Whereas I don’t have a luxury of having a
Such complaints have become common in Centennial. Under the
city’s previous ordinance, a dog could bark loudly for long periods
with impunity as long as it stopped shy of 20 full minutes of
barking. The enforcement clock effectively restarted if the dog
took a short break, regardless of what time of day — or night — the
“We sat down for Christmas dinner and the dog next door started
barking maniacally,” Lynn Nelson told the council. “This is with
our windows and doors closed. We could not hold a conversation at
our table during Christmas dinner.”
Residents like Nelson and Capicotto were elated with a kind of
holiday present in June when the council, as expected, approved
long-awaited changes to the way Centennial deals with excessively
Joe Stafford, the city’s animal-control field-services manager,
outlined the new ordinance for the council before its final
The policy cuts in half to 10 minutes the amount of time a
neighbor must endure barking before the city takes action. At
night, the time is cut to five minutes. Cumulative barking of 90
minutes in any 24-hour period will also constitute a violation.
A written warning will be issued to dog owners upon a first
offense. An animal-control officer will have the discretion to give
a verbal warning, but fines will only be imposed after a written
warning has been issued.
After a written warning, the owner will have five days to find
at least a temporary solution. A neighbor will be required to file
a written complaint by fax or e-mail. An in-person signature will
no longer be required.
A summons and complaint will be issued to an owner if a second
violation occurs on the same property within 12 months of the
written warning. The first fine will be $50. It then jumps to $75
and $100 for successive offences.
“They absolutely have the right to bring that matter to court,”
Stafford said. “… What we’re trying to get is resolution. We’re not
trying to get into people’s pocketbook.”
A warning will expire after one year. In other words, if a
second offense occurs 12 months or more after the original warning,
the owner will receive a new warning, instead of a summons.
“What this does is it recognizes people who have taken action,
attempted to resolve the problem, and gives them another
opportunity for resolution,” Stafford said.
Potentially mitigating situations, such as dogs barking in
response to urban coyotes, will be taken into consideration by
animal-control officers, he added.
According to Stafford, his office received about 250 complaints
a year under the former system. Although he expects that number to
as much as double under the new ordinance, the official does not
anticipate significant costs to the city.
“We were very careful to make sure that we would not overextend
ourselves,” Stafford said of his staff’s drafting the
Other items that may interest you
We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.
The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.