Bill targets medical marijuana abuses

Posted 1/28/10

A bill aiming to clarify and legitimize the relationship between Colorado’s medical marijuana patients and their doctors has gained the backing of …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Username
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you made a voluntary contribution in 2022-2023 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

Bill targets medical marijuana abuses

Posted

A bill aiming to clarify and legitimize the relationship between Colorado’s medical marijuana patients and their doctors has gained the backing of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee.

Senate Bill 109 would prohibit financial conflicts of interest among physicians and caregivers, distributors and other medical marijuana providers.

The measure has the bipartisan sponsorship of a pair of state legislators: Sen. Chris Romer, D-Denver, and Sen. Nancy Spence, R-Centennial.

“We’re dealing with the Wild, Wild West here and we can’t allow it to go on,” Romer said in a news release. “We need to make sure the people who legitimately need medical marijuana have access to it, and we need to get rid of the recreational users who are busying the system.”

On Jan. 27, the first committee passed the bill 6-1, sending it to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Features of the bill include:

Requirement of a “bona fide patient-physician relationship,” which entails a “treatment or counseling relationship,” a physical examination, and an assessment of the patient’s medical history.

Establishment of the definition for a “physician in good standing.”

Requirement of a confidential “registry identification card.”

The bill does not address dispensaries or the number of patients a caregiver may have.

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.