While mayors around the metro area are backing a state legislative effort restricting construction defects lawsuits that they say discourage the building of attainable housing — such as condominiums and townhomes — critics say it would take away …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
If you made a voluntary contribution of $25 or more in Nov. 2017-2018, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access Includes access to all websites
Senate Bill 156 isn’t the only bill on construction defects that has been introduced this legislative session. SB 156 passed the Senate on March 7 and will now go to the House.
Several others purport to ease the lack of attainable home ownership options in the state.
State Rep. Cole Wist, R-Centennial, is a proponent of construction defects reform and is optimistic about the chances of passing for SB 156, which would require homeowner associations to obtain the written consent of a majority of owners in the association before filing a defects lawsuit, as well as disclose the projected cost of the claim and enter into third-party arbitration.
He also thinks that another bill introduced earlier in the session has a good chance of passing the Legislature and going to the governor.
Senate Bill 45
“It has bipartisan support and a high likelihood to pass,” Wist said of Senate Bill 45.
In construction defect actions in court in which more than one insurer has a duty to defend a party, the bill would require the court to apportion the cost of defense among all of them. Bill supporters say it would simplify and reduce litigation costs.
SB 45 has support from both sides of the aisle, with Senate President Kevin Grantham, a Canon City Republican, and House Speaker Crisanta Duran, a Denver Democrat, both sponsoring, along with Wist and Sen. Angela Williams, a Denver Democrat.
The bill passed the Senate Committee on Business, Labor and Technology last month.
House Bill 1169
One construction defects bill has already died in committee, however. House Bill 1169 was postponed indefinitely by the House State, Veterans and Military Affairs Committee on March 1. The bill would have given builders a right to either repair defects or make a settlement offer prior to a defects lawsuit being filed.
Build Our Homes Right, a group opposing several construction defects reform laws, celebrated the announcement.
“Homeowners are relieved the bill that would have forced homeowners to accept inappropriate and inadequate construction repairs was killed in the House today,” said Jonathan Harris of Denver, who chairs the group.
Harris says his condo in the Five Points neighborhood suffered from shoddy construction and the builder’s attempts at repairs worsened the situation.
Wist said construction defects reform supporters were reluctant to support the bill as well.
Senate Bill 155
Introduced last month and under consideration, Senate Bill 155 would clarify the definition of a construction defect as a defect in the design or construction of any improvement to real property that causes damages to or loss of use of real or personal property or personal injury.
Senate Bill 157
Senate Bill 157, introduced last month, would require that homeowners association boards must notify all owners before bringing a suit against a developer or builder for amounts of more than $100,000.
While mayors around the metro area are backing a state legislative effort restricting construction defects lawsuits that they say discourage the building of attainable housing — such as condominiums and townhomes — critics say it would take away a homeowner's right to use the court system.Senate Bill 156 would require homeowner associations to obtain the written consent of a majority of owners in the association before filing a defects lawsuit, as well as disclose the projected cost of the claim and enter into third-party arbitration.According to the Homeownership Opportunity Alliance, a group favoring the bill, as few as two homeowners can file a class action lawsuit on behalf of an HOA.State Rep. Cole Wist, R-Centennial, who is sponsoring the bill in the House, said the status quo has prevented condos from being built.“In 2005, condos comprised 20 percent of the metro Denver new housing market,” he said. “While lawyers made money, today that number has plummeted to 2 percent.”Supporters of construction defects reform say the lack of attainable home purchase options also drives up rental costs as more people who want to buy a home opt to stay in apartments.A press conference was held by supporters of the bill at the Capitol on Feb. 27 before the bill went before the Senate Business, Labor and Technology Committee, which passed it 5-2.Mayors from around the metro area attended the conference, including Adam Paul of Lakewood, Heidi Williams of Thornton, Cathy Noon of Centennial, Jackie Millet of Lone Tree, Marc Williams of Arvada, Herb Atchison of Westminster and Daniel Dick of Federal Heights.Paul said that he had envisioned owner-occupied housing surrounding the Lakewood's seven light rail stations.“At those seven stops right now, what we've seen is apartments, apartments and apartments,” he said.Millet said that over the last 10 years, 2,000 housing units have been built in Lone Tree, but only 93 have been for-sale condos.“The entry-level home just doesn't exist in our community and I think that's a shame,” she said.But critics of SB 156 say there is no proof that construction defects lawsuits are behind the lack of entry-level condos.A group opposing the construction defect reform efforts, Build Our Homes Right, says the bill would shift private arbitration costs to homeowners, although their taxes support the court system.Build Our Homes Right Chairman Jonathan Harris said that arbitration gives the power to developers rather than homeowners.Shortly after buying his condo in Denver in 2004, he said he noticed water leaking around doors and window.“They did some patches, and it would rain again and they'd do more patches,” he said.His condo board finally settled a lawsuit against the developer, builder and architecture firm in 2012 for an undisclosed amount.“I understand we need condominiums," he said. “But I don't think we need poor-quality condominiums.”Peg Rudden, 68, a condo owner who favors SB 156, said that she has medical bills to pay and has been unable to apply for a home equity line of credit on her Centennial condo, which is nearly paid off, due to ongoing litigation.“I was not aware of a lock on my home,” she said, staing she was denied the line of credit due to the litigation against the builder of her condo. “I was not aware of the construction defects.”SB 156 is similar to ordinances passed in several municipalities around the metro area in recent years, including those in Denver, Littleton, Lakewood, Lone Tree, Parker, Westminster, Centennial, Castle Rock, Wheat Ridge and Arvada.But Noon, the Centennial mayor, said the patchwork of local laws has not solved the problem, leaving developers wary.“Do you come in, in an industry and in a state, that you have left years ago, and come in and do one project in the city of Centennial, under one set of rules, and one project in Lone Tree, and one in Arvada?” she said.
Other items that may interest you
We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.
The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.